In general, in what context are we concerned with interpreting coefficients, prediction or inference?
| model type | interpretation of \(\hat\beta\) |
|---|---|
| simple linear regression |
| model type | interpretation of \(\hat\beta\) |
|---|---|
| simple linear regression | A one unit change in \(x\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1\) |
Note: Always state what the units are for \(x\) and what the units are for \(y\) in the context of the problem
| model type | interpretation of \(\hat\beta\) |
|---|---|
| simple linear regression | A one unit change in \(x\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1\) |
| multiple linear regression where \(x_i\) is only included once in the model | A one unit change in \(x_i\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_i\) holding all other variables constant |
Note: Always state what the units are for \(x\) and what the units are for \(y\) in the context of the problem AND what the variables being held constant are
| model type | interpretation of \(\hat\beta\) |
|---|---|
| simple linear regression | A one unit change in \(x\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1\) |
| multiple linear regression where \(x_i\) is only included once in the model | A one unit change in \(x_i\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_i\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where a quadratic of \(x_i\) is also included |
| model type | interpretation of \(\hat\beta\) |
|---|---|
| simple linear regression | A one unit change in \(x\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1\) |
| multiple linear regression where \(x_i\) is only included once in the model | A one unit change in \(x_i\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_i\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where a quadratic of \(x_i\) is also included | A change in \(x_i\) from \(a\) to \(b\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_{x_i}(b-a) + \hat\beta_{x_i^2}(b^2-a^2)\) holding all other variables constant |
| model type | interpretation of \(\hat\beta\) |
|---|---|
| simple linear regression | A one unit change in \(x\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1\) |
| multiple linear regression where \(x_i\) is only included once in the model | A one unit change in \(x_i\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_i\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where a quadratic of \(x_i\) is also included | A change in \(x_i\) from \(a\) to \(b\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_{x_i}(b-a) + \hat\beta_{x_i^2}(b^2-a^2)\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where a quadratic and cubic term of \(x_i\) are also included |
| model type | interpretation of \(\hat\beta\) |
|---|---|
| simple linear regression | A one unit change in \(x\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1\) |
| multiple linear regression where \(x_i\) is only included once in the model | A one unit change in \(x_i\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_i\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where a quadratic of \(x_i\) is also included | A change in \(x_i\) from \(a\) to \(b\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_{x_i}(b-a) + \hat\beta_{x_i^2}(b^2-a^2)\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where a quadratic and cubic term of \(x_i\) are also included | A change in \(x_i\) from \(a\) to \(b\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_{x_i}(b-a) + \hat\beta_{x_i^2}(b^2-a^2)+ \hat\beta_{x_i^3}(b^3-a^3)\) holding all other variables constant |
| model type | interpretation of \(\hat\beta\) |
|---|---|
| simple linear regression | A one unit change in \(x\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1\) |
| multiple linear regression where \(x_i\) is only included once in the model | A one unit change in \(x_i\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_i\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where a quadratic of \(x_i\) is also included | A change in \(x_i\) from \(a\) to \(b\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_{x_i}(b-a) + \hat\beta_{x_i^2}(b^2-a^2)\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where a quadratic and cubic term of \(x_i\) are also included | A change in \(x_i\) from \(a\) to \(b\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_{x_i}(b-a) + \hat\beta_{x_i^2}(b^2-a^2)+ \hat\beta_{x_i^3}(b^3-a^3)\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where an interaction of \(x_i\) with a binary variable is included |
| model type | interpretation of \(\hat\beta\) |
|---|---|
| simple linear regression | A one unit change in \(x\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1\) |
| multiple linear regression where \(x_i\) is only included once in the model | A one unit change in \(x_i\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_i\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where a quadratic of \(x_i\) is also included | A change in \(x_i\) from \(a\) to \(b\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_{x_i}(b-a) + \hat\beta_{x_i^2}(b^2-a^2)\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where a quadratic and cubic term of \(x_i\) are also included | A change in \(x_i\) from \(a\) to \(b\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_{x_i}(b-a) + \hat\beta_{x_i^2}(b^2-a^2)+ \hat\beta_{x_i^3}(b^3-a^3)\) holding all other variables constant |
| multiple linear regression where an interaction of \(x_1\) with a variable \(x_{2}\) is included | A one unit change in \(x_1\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1\) when \(x_{2}=0\) holding all other variables constant |
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x\]
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_0\)?
“When \(x=0\) the average value for y is \(\hat\beta_0\)”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_1\)?
“For every one unit increase in x the expected change in y is \(\hat\beta_1\)”
With an indicator variable
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1(x == 1)\] ::: question How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_0\)? :::
“When \(x=0\) the expected \(y\) is equal to \(\hat\beta_0\)”
With an indicator variable
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1(x == 1)\] ::: question How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_1\)? :::
“Being in group \(x=1\) compared to \(x=0\) yields an expected change in y of \(\hat\beta_1\)”
With an indicator variable, multiple categories, referent is \(x = C\)
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1(x == A) + \hat{\beta}_2(x == B)\] ::: question How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_0\)? :::
“When \(x=C\) the average value of y is \(\hat\beta_0\)”
With an indicator variable, multiple categories, referent is \(x = C\)
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1(x == A) + \hat{\beta}_2(x == B)\] ::: question How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_1\)? :::
“Being in group \(x = A\) compared to the referent category (\(x = C\)) yields an expected change in y of \(\hat\beta_1\)”
With an indicator variable, multiple categories, referent is \(x = C\)
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1(x == A) + \hat{\beta}_2(x == B)\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_2\)?
“Being in group \(x = B\) compared to the referent category (\(x = C\)) yields an expected change in y of \(\hat\beta_2\)”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_0\)?
“When \(x_1=0\) and \(x_2 = 0\), the average value for y is \(\hat\beta_0\)”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_1\)?
“For every one unit increase in x the expected change in y is \(\hat\beta_1\) holding \(x_2\) constant”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_1^2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_0\)?
“When \(x_1=0\), the average value for \(y\) is \(\hat\beta_0\)”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_1^2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_1\)?
We cannot interpret \(\hat\beta_1\) independent of \(\hat\beta_2\). \(\hat\beta_1\) is the linear term for \(x_1\) and \(\hat\beta_2\) is the quadratic term for \(x_1\), a change in \(x_1\) from \(a\) to \(b\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1(b-a)+\hat\beta_2(b^2-a^2)\).
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_1^2+\hat\beta_3x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_1\)?
We cannot interpret \(\hat\beta_1\) independent of \(\hat\beta_2\). \(\hat\beta_1\) is the linear term for \(x_1\) and \(\hat\beta_2\) is the quadratic term for \(x_1\), a change in \(x_1\) from \(a\) to \(b\) yields an expected change in \(y\) of \(\hat\beta_1(b-a)+\hat\beta_2(b^2-a^2)\) holding \(x_2\) constant.
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2 + \hat\beta_3x_1\times x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_0\)?
“When \(x_1=0\) and \(x_2=0\), the average value for \(y\) is \(\hat\beta_0\)”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2 + \hat\beta_3x_1\times x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_1\)?
“When \(x_2=0\), for every one unit increase in \(x_1\) the expected change in y is \(\hat\beta_1\)”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2 + \hat\beta_3x_1\times x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_2\)?
“When \(x_1=0\), for every one unit increase in \(x_2\) the expected change in y is \(\hat\beta_2\)”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2 + \hat\beta_3x_1\times x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_3\)?
“For every one unit increase in \(x_1\) the expected change in slope for \(x_2\) is \(\hat\beta_3\)”
“For every one unit increase in \(x_2\) the expected change in slope for \(x_1\) is \(\hat\beta_3\)”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2 + \hat\beta_3x_3 + \hat\beta_4x_1\times x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_0\)?
“When \(x_1=0\), \(x_2=0\), and \(x_3=0\), the average value for \(y\) is \(\hat\beta_0\)”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2 + \hat\beta_3x_3 + \hat\beta_4x_1\times x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_1\)?
“When \(x_2=0\), for every one unit increase in \(x_1\) the expected change in y is \(\hat\beta_1\) holding \(x_3\) constant”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2 + \hat\beta_3x_3 + \hat\beta_4x_1\times x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_2\)?
“When \(x_1=0\), for every one unit increase in \(x_2\) the expected change in y is \(\hat\beta_2\) holding \(x_3\) constant”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2 + \hat\beta_3x_3 + \hat\beta_4x_1\times x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_3\)?
“For every one unit increase in \(x_3\) the expected change in y is \(\hat\beta_3\), holding \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) constant”
\[\hat{y} = \hat{\beta}_0 + \hat{\beta}_1x_1 + \hat\beta_2x_2 + \hat\beta_3x_3 + \hat\beta_4x_1\times x_2\]
How do you interpret \(\hat\beta_4\)?
“For every one unit increase in \(x_1\) the expected change in slope for \(x_2\) is \(\hat\beta_4\) holding \(x_3\) constant”
“For every one unit increase in \(x_2\) the expected change in slope for \(x_1\) is \(\hat\beta_4\) holding \(x_3\) constant”